California Decert/Recert Scorecard

August 3rd, California Secretary of State Bowen decertified, then recertified the voting systems with new conditions. The conditions are mainly on use of and security of DREs (Direct Recording Electronic voting machines).

New Requirements:


More details:

Diebold, Sequoia, Hart systems decertified and then recertified with additional conditions. From the August 3rd Press Release:
"The primary reason for taking this step is for clarity, ensuring that everything associated with a particular system is in one single recertification document that is easy for the public, elections officials, and others to follow and understand."
I think this means the Secretary can add conditions to any system without six months notice, whereas decertification would require six months notice.

New conditions for Diebold and Sequoia DREs, but not Hart DREs:

New condition for Hart DRE Counties:* New conditions for Diebold, Sequoia, and Hart DREs: Los Angeles status:

For full details:

See the Secretary of State's Top-To-Bottom Review web site. Each decertification/recertification has 35-40 conditions.

* According to "County Voting Systems for the November 7, 2006 General Election", Orange, San Mateo, and Yolo use Hart exclusively, Humboldt, Lake, Madera, Sonoma use the Hart eSlate just for polling place accessibility.

** On March 26, 2007, Secretary Bowen gave Election Systems and Software (ES&S) written notice to provide InkaVote Plus materials within 30 days (as provided in the original Certification document for InkaVote Plus). Despite many further requests, ES&S did not provide the materials until June 26, 2007, too late to be included in the review which ran from May 31, 2007 to July 20, 2007.

By Jerry Berkman, Aug. 5, 2007