California Decert/Recert Scorecard
August 3rd, California Secretary of State Bowen decertified, then recertified
the voting systems with new conditions. The conditions are mainly
on use of and security of DREs (Direct Recording Electronic voting
machines).
New Requirements:
-
Diebold - maximum of one TSx DRE per polling place; TSx ok for early voting with restrictions.
-
Sequoia - maximum of one Edge DRE per polling place; Edge ok for early voting with restrictions.
-
Hart - no new limits on eSlate DRE.
-
AutoMARK - not reviewed, new version submitted to state for certification;
-
Los Angeles:
InkaVote+ certification rescinded due to not supplying Secretary of
State required information, may be examined & recertified.
-
Los Angeles:
Central tabulator (MTS or Gems) - status unclear.
-
Lots of new requirements for all vendors and counties, mainly in the
security and auditing areas.
More details:
Diebold, Sequoia, Hart systems decertified and then recertified
with additional conditions. From the August 3rd
Press Release:
"The primary reason for taking this step is for clarity,
ensuring that everything associated with a particular system
is in one single recertification document that is easy for
the public, elections officials, and others to follow and
understand."
I think this means the Secretary can add conditions to any system
without six months notice, whereas decertification would
require six months notice.
New conditions for Diebold and Sequoia DREs, but not Hart DREs:
-
Jurisdictions may have at most one DRE per polling place for
accessibility/HAVA, but must have at least five persons voluntarily
cast their ballots on each to protect voter privacy.
(Note: it says one per polling place, not one per precinct).
-
DREs may be used in early voting with new restrictions:
they must be staffed only by County elections employees,
one employee there strictly to prevent unauthorized access,
DREs must be locked up overnight in a County facility as secure as
the County's election headquarters,
must reseal security seals each night,
etc.
(Alameda County had early voting at 8 sites, e.g. Berkeley city
hall, Livermore, etc. I doubt any of the above conditions were
met. This may end most early voting, especially at satellite
locations, in Diebold and Sequoia DRE Counties.)
-
Jurisdictions must conduct a 100% manual count of all votes
cast on the DREs in early voting and on election day.
New condition for Hart DRE Counties:*
-
Training of poll workers must include "A voter's right
to vote on a paper ballot (in all DRE polling places) and how
to handle requests for paper ballots.
New conditions for Diebold, Sequoia, and Hart DREs:
-
Before Presidential Primary, all software/firmware must be reinstalled
including operating systems and reformatting hard drives, using
software obtained directly from federal testing lab or Secretary of State.
-
Ban on any component have Internet connectivity, directly or indirectly,
at any time. Ban on wireless and modem transmission with any
component of voting system. No network connections to non-voting system
devices.
-
Public allowed to look at (but not touch) all externally visible
security seals.
-
Poll workers must print two copies of the accumulated vote results
and audit logs for each device; each poll worker must sign all copies,
one set posted outside and one set sent to Registrar.
-
No-one allowed to record order or time of voters voting.
-
Vendor must develop within 60 days plans for lots of stuff including
identification of abnormal voting patterns on VVPAT and escalation of
audit sampling for differences between electronic and manual audit
vote results.
-
Any post-election auditing requirements imposed as a condition of
this certification shall be paid for by the vendor.
-
Secretary of State will establish additional manual audit requirements
including escalation in close races and desired confidence level.
(Is this included in being paid for by vendor?)
And Secretary will establish procedures to increase transparency and
effectiveness of manual counts!
-
Jurisdictions must use the "air-gap" model with separation of functions
of servers for security.
Los Angeles status:
-
InkaVote+ - certification rescinded, may be examined & recertified.
Materials submitted to
late for current review**, but will be reviewed (at extra cost). If
passes review, may be recertified with conditions for Feb. 5, 2008
election.
-
MTS or Gems 2 for Los Angeles - ??? (Rumor has it MTS runs on
Los Angeles County mainframe computers. If so, a red team
test could expose flaws in the County systems, such as payroll,
personnel, etc. and there is no way they would allow such a
test.) Gems 2 is federally qualified, not state certified.
For full details:
See the Secretary of State's
Top-To-Bottom Review web site. Each
decertification/recertification has 35-40 conditions.
* According to
"County Voting Systems for the November 7, 2006 General Election",
Orange, San Mateo, and Yolo use Hart exclusively,
Humboldt, Lake, Madera, Sonoma use the Hart eSlate just for polling
place accessibility.
** On March 26, 2007, Secretary Bowen gave Election Systems and
Software (ES&S) written notice to provide InkaVote Plus materials
within 30 days (as provided in the original Certification document
for InkaVote Plus). Despite many further requests, ES&S did not
provide the materials until June 26, 2007, too late to be included
in the review which ran from May 31, 2007 to July 20, 2007.
By Jerry Berkman, Aug. 5, 2007